Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Komal (martial art)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per lack of reliable sources. Tikiwont (talk) 09:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Komal (martial art)[edit]

NN art reads like an advert Nate1481(^t/_c) 10:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Nate1481(^t/_c) 10:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep It has only been tagged for sources for a short time. AfD might prompt people to add cites RogueNinja_talk 15:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems notable to me --UltraMagnus (talk) 09:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per UltraMagnus Kitty53 (talk) 22:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability for this newly created art. JJL (talk) 02:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no references to support assertions of notability. Bradford44 (talk) 23:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete completely unnotable. I cannot find a single source anywhere on the internet about this martial art, I am not kidding, I have combed through the first 100 results on a Google search for +Komal +Brazil and there is not a single relevant hit there. - Icewedge (talk) 17:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. In fact, lack of any coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 17:43, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.