Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koimoi (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 05:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Koimoi[edit]

Koimoi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. First AfD resulted in no consensus with the second resulting in keep. Low participation in both. Cannot find sources to support notability. CNMall41 (talk) 21:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - The article lacks substantial evidence of notability according to Wikipedia's guidelines WP:GNG, with no independent secondary reliable sources cited. Additionally, the website itself is deemed unreliable under WP:ICTFSOURCES. The first cited link is blog website not a reliable source at all. Grabup (talk) 14:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The relevant guideline here would be WP:NCORP, right? I don't think we've got any hope of that if no one's been able to make a solid keep vote through all of these AfDs. I went looking through google scholar/books and found a lot of glancing hits (eg, "Koimoi lists both Bollywood and Hollywood movies"), but nothing substantial. -- asilvering (talk) 05:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.