Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge tree training

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Delete. Speedy deleted A7 by Iridescent (non-admin closure) Jbh ^Talk 21:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledge tree training[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG . The sources are press releases and all I can find in my searches are blogs and social media. Jbh ^Talk 16:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 16:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 16:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 16:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORP as there is no substantial coverage of the company in reliable sources. SmartSE (talk) 13:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.