Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knaack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC) delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Knaack[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of notability. Disputed prod with no rationale. noq (talk) 23:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Rather promotional or self-congratulatory in tone, but no outside sourcing showing. Non-notable. Carrite (talk) 03:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable Dreamspy (talk) 07:18, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: refs do not establish notability. Dewritech (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, strongly promotional in tone (a leading producer of job site storage for the industrial and construction markets) and no showing of historical, technical, or cultural significance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.