Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klaus Armstrong-Braun (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:43, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Klaus Armstrong-Braun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable environmental campaigner, fails WP:POLITICIAN –– Jezhotwells (talk) 03:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No references added since last AfD nearly two years ago. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 03:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. A good case of the failure of eventualism. --Mkativerata (talk) 04:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. We shouldn't delete the article just because the references brought up in the last AfD weren't added to the article - if that's the only problem, someone should work them in. (And definitely rewrite the article so it's not such a shameless campaign piece.) The only real question is whether the references brought up in the last AfD are enough to confer notability. I'm undecided myself. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 07:32, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no notability demonstrated in any source, and no sources to support the claims. N2e (talk) 02:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.