Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kizhekketheruvu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear fail of WP:GEOLAND.

Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 01:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kizhekketheruvu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEOLAND; road junctions are not presumed notable and there's no significant coverage or other indication of notability. Lennart97 (talk) 19:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 19:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 19:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 19:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Uncited article that some's padded out with unrelated cruft. FOARP (talk) 09:44, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Explicit. Appreciate the re-list is to get further consensus but this is an unreferenced article, the PROD was getting on 10 years ago, and it was only de-prodded because the PRODer omitted to give a PROD reason. Suggest that if there aren't any further !votes after this re-list the closer just delete anyway. FOARP (talk) 14:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.