Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiyojute Ryu Kempo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was rename to William Durbin and clean up to remove advertisement and to address unverified assertions. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kiyojute Ryu Kempo[edit]

Non notable style. The article itself claims lack of notability. Ceated 20 years ago, it only has 9 dojos throughout the world. RogueNinja_talk 10:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —RogueNinja_talk 10:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Umm you forgot to tag the article, to be honest I've never added an AfD tag and I don't want to risk botching it up. --Sin Harvest (talk) 10:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus, in the past 24 hours, Twinkle has screwed up 3 or 4 times for me. RogueNinja_talk 10:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to William Durbin and keep. The practitioner is more notable than the style in this case [1]. JJL (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to William Durbin and keep. The practitioner is more notable than the style. The article should be marked with {fact} where citations would help. jmcw (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 09:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support a rename and trimming some of the adverty bits out --Nate1481(^t/_c) 14:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rename indeed, deleting may be way too far, while the style is not notable. Pundit|utter 20:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.