Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiwi cola
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kiwi cola[edit]
- Kiwi cola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable product. Internet search reveals very little. The official Facebook fan page has six followers, which might give an indication of the importance of this product. Schwede66 09:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete primarily a stub with hardly any third party references. – Novice7 (talk) 12:52, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Self-promotional. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 19:52, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, I hadn't realised that. The producer of this product is David Wright, according to this newspaper article. The user who created the WP article is Dlmwright. Schwede66 01:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:21, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources. I did find this story about the company, which mentions the product. But that's a far cry from what's needed to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 18:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agree with Whpq. That source is the only one that shows up in an "all dates" Gnews search. I found one-line mentions of the product in four books from Gbooks, but nothing of any substance. It appears there are no reliable sources as yet. Geoff Who, me? 18:37, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GNG, very little coverage. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.