Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial documents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial documents[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article violates WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The main article covering the case is Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. To the extent any of these documents are worth discussing, they are properly discussed in the main article. But none of the documents individually, nor the documents grouped together (outside a discussion of the case), pass WP:N. Back in 2008, there seemed to be a rough consensus reached on the talk page that the article did not belong on Wikipedia, but rather Wikisource instead. That consensus was never acted upon, though, so far as I can tell. Novaseminary (talk) 03:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:This is exactly what WP:NOT, especially WP:INDISCRIMINATE is for. As Novaseminary says, any relevant documents should be included in the main article; an exhaustive list is neither appropriate, nor helpful, nor necessary. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.