Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitty Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Characters of Terabithia. MBisanz ^talk 04:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: The Article needs to be merged to Characters of the Bartimaeus Trilogy--Beligaronia (talk) 07:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kitty Jones[edit]

This character does not establish notability independent of the Bartimaeus Trilogy through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the coverage in the main articles is enough detail on the character. TTN (talk) 01:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Combine I recommend combining these more minor characters into a characters of Terabithia article. You aren't going to be able to shoehorn all the information people want to include into the movie/ book/ teleseries article. But at least you can consolidate into an article focusing on the character and redirect there. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The same reason I gave in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic in the Bartimaeus Trilogy. Dekisugi (talk) 08:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above - agree with nom & Dekisugi. Eusebeus (talk) 00:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Combine or Keep There is important information gleaned from the book that is not included in the main article on the trilogy. This needs to be kept somewhere.--Beligaronia (talk) 09:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.