Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitties & rainbows

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Conensus not reached. Keep. Enochlau 04:32, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kitties & rainbows[edit]

Supposedly a group that meets semi-annually for video-game performance art. Not encyclopedically interesting or even verifiable in the slightest. 165.189.91.148 18:32, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think it has been held as one side effect of the MIicrosoft XBox Live community. If anything, maybe this page could help describe the social implications of Microsofts service.

Delete I tried to tag this one as speedy, but they expanded it just past the threshold for such a delete. nn. Youngamerican 19:26, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with everyone else. No sources are sited, and in the future, article will be very hard to maintain.TheRingess 18:14, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think you all need to grow a sense of humor and maybe look at other articles that waste space here, such as the excessively long entry for '50 Cent'.
Keep At least as a stub, and maybe give it time for people who are involved to write it up. I'm willing to give a nascent real-world "thing" the benefit of the doubt and let its article evolve over time, too. However, If the article continues to languish for the next month or two, I could be persuaded to change my mind. RandyKaelber 23:43, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not significant. Catamorphism 23:55, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.