Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kittens of Woodlake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Incubate. Moved to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Kittens of Woodlake Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kittens of Woodlake[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable independent film, sources are all local and do not satisfy WP:N. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:05, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - better to prune and wikify etc, rather than delete.SE7^Talk/_Contribs 20:19, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete supposed film, not on IMDB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With respects Andrew, IMDB is not the repository if all films ever made, and would not contibute any notability even were this one be listed there. Better to look at the sources provided to see that it does indeed exist, and then look for more and see if we can determine if it can meet WP:NF. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Incubate per WP:TOOSOON. I just went through and gave the article a cleanup and sourcing, but notability is not quite there yet. I was going to suggest userfication, but my own suspician is that the SPA author LMorley100 is quite likely the film's writer/director Lynnette Morley, and a userfication would encourage a furthe conflict of interest. If deleted from mainspace and incubated, the author (who up til now was not notified of this AFD) can be advised of WP:COI and asked to not edit the article further... allowing others to address additional sourcing in incubation as the film gains coverage. And if the film does not get more coverage, it will be deleted from incubation. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:29, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article author now notified and cautioned. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.