Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitten Rescue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:38, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kitten Rescue[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. Normal Op (talk) 08:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Normal Op (talk) 08:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Normal Op (talk) 08:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom - no RS establishing this as notable. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not notable, inadequate sourcing.--SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found a several LA Times articles that talks about it relating to COVID-19; and people's magazine article about Colton Haynes adopting a cat from there, but those things are not really sufficient. Being in LA Times for LA related matters is quite a bit different from non-California matters being talked about in LA Times. Graywalls (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.