Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kishen Das

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominated by a confirmed blocked sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals as per point 4 of WP:Speedy keep(non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kishen Das[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~All the coverages are about his film. Lack of in-depth coverages. Thus the subject is not meeting WP:GNG. Also the subject is written from fan point of view.Trakinwiki (talk) 21:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Trakinwiki (talk) 21:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:13, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This tag has be added by a relatively new user who created his account recently hopefully without going through the article references in deep. Most of the articles kept as reference in the article are from reputed newspapers including The Hindu , The Indian Express, Times of India etc and having the actors name in Title of the article as well. Mutiple factors of notabilty is proved and enough and more articles are furnished to pass WP:GNG very well. Jehowahyereh (talk) 04:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:Those coverages are not in-depth coverages. So according to WP:GNG the subject is not meeting wikipedia criteria. Trakinwiki (talk) 15:33, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Multiple references indicating notability. Proton Dental (talk) 11:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:Those coverages are not in-depth coverages. So according to WP:GNG the subject is not meeting wikipedia criteria. Trakinwiki (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, nominator blocked as a sockpuppet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.