Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirtik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kirtik[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article that has been unsourced and orphaned for almost 15 years(!). Full of WP:OR "The word kirtik is most probably derived from..." failing both WP:V and WP:GNG. Possibly WP:MADEUP too. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Probably does have references/rules online, not seeing anything when I look. Oaktree b (talk) 21:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not seeing what makes this game notable. Śources not found. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per above and the fact that it is the name of a penalty in a card game, so should be in that article, not a separate one. Nigej (talk) 17:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia has never published original research nor synthesis. Bearian (talk) 19:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.