Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiril Chukanov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kiril Chukanov[edit]
- Kiril Chukanov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Self-sourced article on someone whose claims have not been published in any reputable journal. Guy (Help!) 13:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - external links are to self-published sources, and the article admits he hasn't published his research in peer-reviewed journals. No evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources to establish notability per WP:PROF. Delete unless properly sourced by the end of this AfD. Walton Vivat Regina! 16:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As nobody besides himself has noticed his work, he is not notable. All refs. from his own site. DGG 16:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 23:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "has not published"? "undisclosed location"? This article goes beyond the usual failure to assert notability and instead asserts non-notability. —David Eppstein 23:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.