Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Uniyal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. plicit 06:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kiran Uniyal[edit]

Kiran Uniyal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Holders of Guinness World Records are presumably not notable for Wikipedi entries. Tictictoc (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Women, and India. Tictictoc (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi this page is not about 'Guinness World Records' or 'Guinness World Records Holders' . This is about a Martial Art player who is contributing her values towards her society and women empowerment. She is a very well known personality in her field and country. Kiran is trying to create awareness of the importance of self-defense among women. Don't delete her page she need support also from us to deliver her values. She is doing very great. TheHelix0 (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Just having Guinness World Records does not make one notable about given the amount of coverage in sources in the article of her for multiple events, does make her notable. Skynxnex (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I totally agree with you, but she is not notable because of her Guinness World Records. She is notable because of her skills. She is a martial art player and also a social worker who is doing very great for women welfare and women empowerment. She is not only recognized but also very famous because of her work and we have to support her work. So don't delete this page and also it's a humble request to remove this deletion tag from this article. I have provided all the possible sources to make things clear and visible to every one. TheHelix0 (talk) 10:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @TheHelix0 The Article for Deletion notice will stay on Kiran Uniyal until the discussion on this paged is closed by an uninvolved editor--likely an administrator. The result will be based on the discussion here and and Wikipedia policy. It could be keep, delete, redirect, or merge, in most cases.
    Remember that our definition of WP:NOTABILITY is based on what WP:RELIABLESOURCES say about the person so the fact that she is a martial artist and a social worker helping people (which is great!) isn't what makes for a Wikipedia article, only if WP:RS discuss her and those activities. As I mentioned in my keep comment, I think that there is enough sourcing to just meet our standards but if you have any additional reliable sources that go into any more detail, feel free to add them to the article. Skynxnex (talk) 16:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts, Delhi, and Uttarakhand. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep . I have Added Few More Refrences Which Shows That This Subject Is Not Notable For His World Records Or Guiness Records Even She has Several Works Also As Activist.@ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manpreet09876 (talkcontribs) 07:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.