Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Saldanha
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kiran Saldanha[edit]
- Kiran Saldanha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to fail WP:BIO. SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. Interwiki are really absent. I have doubts, that professional gamers can be notable at all. LexArt (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no verifiable sources. Also, at least one other person believes it to be fiction: [1] -RunningOnBrains 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Abecedare (talk) 18:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the only two references are an XFire account and a blog. Either non-notable or an outright hoax. Orbital Delegate (talk) 13:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Spam. --Peephole (talk) 17:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I've just removed sections of heavy POV and the citation to a self-published source. This leaves unverified material, and no assertion of notability. Web search returns a ream of unrelated hits. Delete per WP:V and WP:N. Marasmusine (talk) 13:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources to verify any claims; would perhaps fail WP:BIO even if claims were verified. Abecedare (talk) 19:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.