Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Tweety
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 03:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
King Tweety[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- King Tweety (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NF, all coverage is just reproduction of the same press release, no independent coverage by reliable sources, draftification would be appropriate seeing as the film may receive more coverage once it is released BOVINEBOY2008 18:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Comics and animation. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Draftify Clear case of WP:TOOSOON. Currently fails WP:NF DonaldD23 talk to me 20:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- Draftify per WP:TOOSOON, can be taken back out of draft space once more substantial content exists. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.