Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Myers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

King Myers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my PROD "Nothing convincing for his own notability and substance, no chartings or anything at all, listed sources are either simply for listings or interviews, simply nothing actually convincing at all; searches haven't found anything noticeably better.". but it was actually past PRODed by Joseph2302 so here we are at AfD. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources He's young, pop singers usually are but he is getting coverage. Sources: New YOrk Daily News describes him as an "up-and-coming rapper" [1], Newsday [2]. Here's Newsday Wyandanch to host 'Village Vibes' free concert series: King Myers[3] describing him as a "rising star" - granted, he's a local boy. And HipHopDX is all over this kid. I'd like to have someone who edits pop music weigh in.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep subject has notable publications in news — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uneducatedidiot (talk • contribs) 05:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC) See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Heathnw77/Archive --Lemongirl942 (talk) 23:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still none of it is actually suggestive of finally and convincingly establishing his own independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- Is MTV listing considered as part of sources: MTV? K.e.coffman (talk) 06:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is, but we would still need better sources. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:22, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is way too soon. The NYDailyNews is the best source we can get. The Newsday is a local source and a trivial mention talking about a rescheduling of a concern - there's hardly anything about the subject itself. The MTV source mentioned by K.e.coffman is a WP:USERGENERATED source and essentially a directory listing (See disclaimer below This site contains content from artists, fans, and writers from around the internet in it's natural form. Such content is not representative of Viacom Media Networks.. Overall, this is just WP:TOOSOON and a clear delete. I see this essentially as a promotional page for an upcoming artist. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 00:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON; the subject is not yet notable per available sources. When RS take note of the subject's career, an article can be created. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.