Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Angaddev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Draft can be requested via WP:REFUND. Sandstein 16:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

King Angaddev[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Antila333 (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Antila333 (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Antila333 (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:24, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably 'delete: perhaps userify -- The article has a lot of links but they are almost all to Hindi sources, so that I have no idea what they say. The one exception does not actually say anything about the subject. I am not sure if this is a piece of Hinduva propaganda (which is frequently distorted). It might even be a hoax. It is possible that this is a translation from a Hindi WP. Certainly in its present form, it is such a poor article that it cannot be kept in WP mainspace. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This article lacks context to make me understand if this person is notable. Maybe draftify till we can figure out exactly what is going on.★Trekker (talk) 15:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify The article was previously draftified by me due to a lack of sources proving notability and poor translation. The article's creator just re-created it in mainspace again apparently. The subject of the article seems notable, but the article is clearly incomplete and should be improved upon in draftspace. lovkal (talk) 18:15, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Draftify, in its current state, it is a WP:HOAX. Argal state is a traditional account of a regional rajput feudatory. I don't know if it would even qualify WP:GNG. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 13:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.