Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Wood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:28, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberly Wood[edit]

Kimberly Wood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is either somewhere between a hoax and massive self-promotion. I cannot verify any of the article's claims. No person by this name is listed in the credits of any of these movies. All the references lead back to the person's website or have no bearing on the article's claims. The creator, Magickali13 (talk · contribs), is pretty clearly either the person herself or knows her. Note that this topic was rejected at Articles for creation at the same time this article was created. Mackensen (talk) 23:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as both failing WP:GNG and self promotion. Search results lead back to the article and directories leading to similarly-named individuals. One source leads back to her website, another makes no mention of the subject, the third is a gallery and hence unusable as a source. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 01:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 01:51, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 01:51, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Not something we need here. WP:CRYSTAL may apply here pbp 17:02, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The fact that the articles tells us the subject was cast as an audience member alone suggests they are probably not notable. Even the claim about being cast in an undisclosed upcoming film does not actually say they are notable. Utterly not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.