Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Hamilton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberly Hamilton[edit]

Kimberly Hamilton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable. Stub joke of an article tolerated long enough. Quis separabit? 16:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  17:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  17:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  17:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete No individual presence of note in the team. No proof she is a WWE writer either, and so removed. Mega Z090 (talk) 21:55, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 18:14, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, due to lack of non-trivial coverage about this individual from reliable third parties. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.