Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberley Bolton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberley Bolton[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a BLP. Most of its sources are dead links, but I used internet archive to check them - there is a press release from her employer, a short interview with no framing or analysis, (see WP:INTERVIEW), and the subject's LinkedIn profile. In the external links section is another interview published on a blog, and a 'meet the team' page of a company she founded. I have searched for better sourcing, but have drawn a blank. The subject does not pass WP:GNG. GirthSummit _(blether) 15:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 15:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 15:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 15:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: a paucity of independent, reliable secondary sources indicates a failure of WP:NPROF while the winning of a non-notable award is insufficient to pass WP:ANYBIO. ——Serial 18:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No independent reliable sources whatsoever – those in the page are (1) a PRnewswire press-release (2) an "interview" (probably another press-release) and (3) LinkedIn. No hits on GBooks, one mention on GNews (The Times), nothing on Scholar, nothing on JSTOR. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User talk:Travfurler may be of interest or even relevance. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:08, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Charmk (talk) 13:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.