Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimber Henry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 14:28, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kimber Henry[edit]

Kimber Henry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The majority of sources used in the article are episodes, episode recaps and interviews, which doesn't demonstrate notability per WP:FICTION/WP:N. A quick Google search gives episodes recaps, interviews and information unrelated to the character. Spinixster (chat!) 10:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I couldn't find anything either, and despite the article's numerous sources, I don't believe most of them demonstrate notability, as the vast majority are primary. Pokelego999 (talk) 18:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.