Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Shin-Jo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. withdrawn by nom. DGG (talk) 22:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kim Shin-Jo[edit]
- Kim Shin-Jo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article's subject does not appear to be notable. Theserialcomma (talk) 11:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep: Despite the fact that the article lists only one source a Google search finds 820, most of which are a) reliable third-party sources (including CNN and the New York Times, among others) and b) actually about the subject of the article. Furthermore, he's the only survivor of a group of assassins that set out to kill a major world leader - that seems pretty notable. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Articles in the New York Time – Washington Post – International Herald Tribune – CNN and so on and so on, as shown here [1], denotes notability. In addition, I have inline cited and referenced article. Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 12:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per significant coverage in sources as detailed above. I've added a few details to the article but several of the sources are behind paywalls - anyone with access fill like giving a hand? Olaf Davis (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 17:41, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as the nom, i wish to withdraw the AFD in light of the new evidence and consequently WP:Snowball Theserialcomma (talk) 22:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.