Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Kwak-kyung-hee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. @Explicit, as I said on the other one. If you find sourcing, feel free to restore to draft without going through me. Star Mississippi 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Kwak-kyung-hee[edit]

Kim Kwak-kyung-hee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed GNG with majority of source passing mention. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 10:38, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. A search for "김곽경희" yields a number of sources. I'll try to determine if there's enough to establish notability. plicit 14:19, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I read though some of the articles and they seem to be all WP:PASSINGMENTIONS RoostTC(Please ping me) 15:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → lettherebedarklight晚安おやすみ → 15:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.