Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Khan Zaki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Contender Asia#Contestants. (non-admin closure) buff bills 7701 12:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Khan Zaki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable kickboxer - no real track record. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 22. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 16:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Contender Asia#Contestants Doesn't meet the notability criteria for kickboxers at WP:KICK and the article lacks significant coverage from independent sources. Redirect to the television series where he appeared for one fight since he doesn't seem to meet the criteria for his own article. Papaursa (talk) 04:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect Nothing shows he should have an individual article.204.126.132.231 (talk) 19:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 07:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Contender Asia#Contestants per Papaursa, as the subject of the article has not received enough coverage outside of the show. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BASIC, WP:BLP1E. If we redirect, does that mean that the remaining redlinks at The Contender Asia#Contestants are likely to result in the same treatment (assuming no independent notability)? Even if it's likely as a search term, a redirect to that table doesn't seem to me to provide much encyclopedic information about the subject. -- Trevj (talk) 07:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, redirection should probably be done for the other contestants also. It's still a search term, and there could always be a person who would try to look up the people in question. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.