Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Kaphwan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Fatal Fury characters. ✗plicit 14:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Kim Kaphwan[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kim Kaphwan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor character clearly fails WP:GNG. Despite well written, sources were mostly from unreliable and blogs. Also at reception section, those were full of passing mentions and listicles, thus showing zero WP:SIGCOV. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 12:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 12:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 12:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment #44, the Den of Geek reference, is clearly RS and discusses the character not only in his own section... but in about 8-10 other characters' as well. I'm unable to read any of the non-English sources, but based on the coverage there, I would be surprised if this is truly NN. Regardless, this should not be deleted--so if it's NN, to which franchise should it be redirected? Jclemens (talk) 19:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to List of Fatal Fury characters. Nothing but trivial mentions in the article, and the Japanese sources are WP:PRIMARY anyway. I am surprised nobody noticed its lack of notability until now. Wikipedia is not FANDOM. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Merge I Made this years ago when I had no idea what was notability. Tintor2 (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.