Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Bell Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Bell Jr.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of notability, no reliable, independent sourcing. Promotional article created by SPA whose only contributions promote the subject and his webzine. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete – fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO. No significant coverage or indication of any impact in any field. If his webzine ever becomes notable in the future, his coverage in an article on it will most likely suffice. JFHJr (㊟) 00:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gongshow ^Talk 17:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to fail the notability guidelines as outlined above. Appears to me that this is a "local name" who is known by a few people but not wide enough to be included here. doktorb _words^deeds 11:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.