Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kid Gravity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kid Gravity[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is not much different from Disney's Tall Tails which I have also nominated for deletion. This comic does not seem to show much notability either. It consists of only a few short sentences in the opening paragraph and a section on the characters in the comic. This article is alao a WP:STUB and is unsourced lacking any verification and attribution. It only has one external link (The official Kid Gravity website) As suggested in the article, it also appears to lack any significant coverage. This comic has only been a part of Disney Adventures and it ought to be merged (or redirected) to that article since it does not seem worthy of its own article. trainfan01 9:00, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Disney Adventures. The subject does not appear to be independently notable: the only references I can find are a passing mention in The librarian's guide to graphic novels for children and tweens and a paragraph here by the comic's creator, Landry Walker. Neither is sufficient to demonstrate notability. Jimmy Pitt talk 10:51, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.