Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kid Dakota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, as per consensus; there are no calls for deletion outside of the nominator. Non-admin closure. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kid Dakota[edit]

No sources found, speedy declined. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Found some sources: [1], [2], [3], [4]. There's a fair bit more too. Quantpole (talk) 00:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:MUSIC #10 by being part of a compilation album and #5 by having three albums on two sufficiently notable indie record labels: Graveface which has an article and Chairkickers which has no article but is listed on some search results in wikipedia. ZabMilenko 05:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1 for the above mentioned ref's, and there's 2 rated reviews at Allmusic, [5], [6] as well. What's up TPH, this is not like you to miss those? Esradekan Gibb ^"Klat" 10:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The band (or its albums) have the subject of many reliable sources as noted above (found an additional review here [7]). With these sources the article satisfies the general notability guideline. –Megaboz (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:MUSIC easily with the additional sourcing. Ironholds (talk) 23:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.