Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khota Rairi Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-01-01 04:31Z

Khota Rairi Association[edit]

Unsourced, zero Google hits, and complete nonsense according to this post. A rights association for divorced donkeys? Prod contested, and not speedyable as a hoax, so here it goes. Delete as nominator. Femto 17:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as joke article. Tarinth 18:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Suspected hoaxes are not patent nonsense and can't be speedied according to WP:CSD and WP:HOAX. Femto 18:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But it isn't a suspected hoax; read it and you'll see that it is patent nonsense. Tarinth 18:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Patent Nonsense: Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever. --Eqdoktor 19:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as vandalism - first line of WP:VANDAL: Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia, also per WP:SNOW. I believe the WP:CSD "hoax exception" is intended to stop deletion of articles on obscure subjects made in good faith rather than to allow this kind of prank article to slip through and get mirrored all over the web. JMHO. Tubezone 19:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'll give a just plain Delete as nonsensical hoax garbage. RGTraynor 19:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete the main term 'Khota Rairis' gets 1 ghit on a blog, and even there it appears to be just nonsense! SkierRMH 20:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Merge discussions should take place on the talk pages of the respective articles, rather than AfD. Not sure quite what this editor is up to, has a pattern of edits and behavior on random topics which make no sense —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rugbyball (talk • contribs) 18:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Rugbyball has been adding the same confusing message in several AfDs. Femto 19:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete doesn't exist. -Slash-^μιλώ 03:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.