Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khan-Sharif Controversy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Khan-Sharif Controversy[edit]
- Khan-Sharif Controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly written article without clear intent, the notion of a "controversy" is highly subjective, as it the use of the word "blames". Furthermore, I am unsure whether or not the Khan-Sharif relationship merits a separate article. I would perhaps welcome an addition regarding possible coalition possibilities to the Pakistan 11 may elections article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistani_general_election,_2013 . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwakigavli1234 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC) — Wikiwakigavli1234 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Faizan -Let's talk! 07:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Faizan -Let's talk! 07:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOR, article title is not appropriate as per WP:CRITERIA. Faizan -Let's talk! 07:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Is not notable enough to have an article of its own. —Syɛd Шαмiq Aнмɛd Hαsнмi (тαlк) 06:12, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.