Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalil and Majnun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khalil and Majnun[edit]

Khalil and Majnun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wanted this subject to be notable. I could not find RS for this book about sexuality - just blogs and book sellers. The book fails WP:N and WP:SNG Lightburst (talk) 23:13, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I expect we could just have had the prod play out, but eh, whatever. As the prodder, I agree. Ravenswing 00:58, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Anaglyphic (talk) 21:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 10:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.