Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalil Berro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 07:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khalil Berro[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a request for G11 speedy deletion, because it didn't quite seem to fit the requirements for G11. However, the article doesn't seem to have any credible claim of notability about its subject. Fails WP:GNG. Expect some COI and/or SPA editors to show up at this discussion. ‑Scottywong | [yak] || 07:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ‑Scottywong | [yak] || 07:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If you look at ZOE "Magazine" and scroll to the bottom of their website, it disclaims that it is owned and operated by Albamedia, an Italian web development/PR/Digital Marketing firm. The other two sources that aren't his own website or Youtube read like paid articles. Fails GNG, possibly to A7 levels. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks very much like promotion for a non-notable artist. Quality and diversity of sources fails GNG.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatMontrealIP (talk • contribs) 16:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Nachtbold (talk) 17:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A self-promoting teenager rather than a notable artist. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Created by what seems to be a sockpuppet used for promotional purposes. No evidence of notabily, fails GNG and NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 18:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.