Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaigam killing, 2009

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 07:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Khaigam killing, 2009[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and WP:LASTING Darkness Shines (talk) 15:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:27, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems worth including a bit about this somewhere in the Encyclopedia. The shooting brought about protests. Is there a workable merge target related to the ongoing disputes over Kashmir? Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Candleabracadabra: It could probably go into Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir article? Darkness Shines (talk) 11:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - and a discussion should take place at the articles talk page with what to do with it.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. If the incident has had an enduring effect of significance, this has not been demonstrated. --BDD (talk) 00:13, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom , BDD and WP:lasting .Kashmir Conflict is a major conflict with thousands killed and we cannot have a article for every incident unless as User BDD rightly notes only If an incident has had an enduring effect of significance this is not the case here.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:11, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:49, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. While this event did have an impact, it does not appear to have been a lasting one. Jinkinson talk to me 16:28, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.