Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keymagic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 14:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keymagic[edit]
- Keymagic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable software. Brianga (talk) 16:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom RayAYang (talk) 03:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 03:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Obvious use of Wikipedia for self-promotions proposites. Zero Kitsune (talk) 04:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Arguments NOT to Delete
- I have not used Wikipedia for self promotion purposes. I don't know what 'proposites' mean and could not Google the word. If this is a Wikipedia term, I would like to get a link. I have also updated the article with independent reference rather than the developer site. To address Zero Kitsune concerns, I am not the developer nor involved with them. This entry is similar to tise, Wnn, Google Pinyin and ATOK. I have categorized it similarly now. There will be a limit to the extent of notability such software can have considering that it is for a minority language. As such it is the only software available at not cost for Unicode Burmese script input. Hence will the new citation link satisfy criteria for notability? Thanks. --RaviC (talk) 11:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This article needs more reliable sources or to be deleted. Reliably or nothing. Zero Kitsune (talk) 03:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no verifiable notability. Mukadderat (talk) 15:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.