Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Key Objects Library

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:13, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Key Objects Library[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not interested in programming myself, and this article is quite technical, but I can't see any evidence that this "library" meets WP:GNG. I rejected an A7 CSD, because it was ineligible. Claritas § 20:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, notability was not demonstrated. --Muhandes (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A code library with no evidence of significance outside of programming communities, and for that matter no evidence of significance within them either. Oddly written in sentence fragments, making it somewhat hard to figure out what the article wants to say: Theme of writing a minimal (in size) applications on Delphi disclosed widely enough. Various solutions of this problem, such as a complete rejection of the use of any library and writing programs in API, and the use of other visual libraries, other than VCL (ACL, KOL). - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 22:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, no significant coverage I can find. --Nuujinn (talk) 21:13, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.