Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevined

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was - Delete - after reading and per note below this is a clear Speedy G3 - Peripitus (Talk) 02:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kevined[edit]

Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang — ERcheck (talk) 22:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary; Wiktionary or Urban Dictionary are probably better places to put this content. Wandering Courier (talk) 22:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and as neologism. andy (talk) 22:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Looks like a bit of gentle not-quite-personal-attack ribbing. Tonywalton ^Talk 23:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The nominator is correct. Pastor Theo (talk) 23:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per above, just kevin this article on out of here. Mandsford (talk) 13:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 06:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(Speedy) Delete. I still believe this is "blatant and obvious misinformation" and hence eligible for {{db-g3}} . WWGB (talk) 10:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.