Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin and Kell Role-Playing Game
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kevin and Kell Role-Playing Game[edit]
- Kevin and Kell Role-Playing Game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A Google Books search and a Google News archive search comes up with no hits for this role-playing game. Darkshire.net does not appear to be a reliable source while ComStar Media and Kevinandkell.com are primary sources, leaving Geeknative.com as the only potentially reliable secondary source addressing this game. This one review does not demonstrate in itself the game's notability and no others appear to exist, therefore the game fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Neelix (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral as PROD decliner, I take no particular opinion on the notability here, just referred it here for a full discussion because there appear to have been multiple sources asserted. Jclemens (talk) 20:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lack of secondary sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.