Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Pamphile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Pamphile[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This player is not notable via WPNGRIDORON nor WP:GNG, although he may be in the near future. Jacona (talk) 18:01, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seems to be a case of WP:TOO SOON. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 18:25, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. NFL draft picks almost always receive substantial coverage and Pamphile is no exception. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] etc. Passes WP:GNG. --Arxiloxos (talk) 02:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All of the nominations by this particular nominator appear to be based on a misunderstanding of how WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON work together. WP:GNG trumps all other WikiProject-specific notability guidelines. Ejgreen77 (talk) 21:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per WP:NCOLLATH. Has received coverage beyond that of a typical member of a notable college team. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 05:17, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet NCOLLATH or NGRIDIRON. All the coverage is routine sports reporting about his attempt to make an NFL team. Every player drafted is not automatically notable and they all receive this kind of coverage.204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article clearly meets WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON. Badgersox (talk) 11:20, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.