Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin L. Barney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 01:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin L. Barney[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. Source searches are only providing a passing mention (not significant coverage) and quotations from the subject (primary in nature). Furthermore, the article is entirely reliant upon unreliable sources and primary sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see the coverage needed to meet the GNG and I don't see evidence he meets WP:NAUTHOR (340 blogs for By Common Consent doesn't do it).Sandals1 (talk) 14:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There isn't even a viable claim of notability here. --Michig (talk) 09:49, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, insufficient claim to notability, promo. Szzuk (talk) 17:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.