Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Jacobsen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Wifione ....... Leave a message 07:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kevin Jacobsen[edit]
- Kevin Jacobsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject doesn't appear to be of sufficient notably. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 03:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete I've found over 35,200 hits so far of related articles, does not entirely assure this is notable enough however. hmssolent\Let's convene 05:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Clearly notable and a significant part of Australian popular music history. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 02:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. Member of notable pop music band, later a leading concert promoter and company director. WWGB (talk) 03:41, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per WWGB Paul foord (talk) 05:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep there is a lot of articles with coverage about Kevin Jacobsen, one example being Holmes, Peter (1 July 2007), "The bitter public rift in Col Joye's family", Sunday Telegraph that begins "LEGENDARY impresario Kevin Jacobsen". duffbeerforme (talk) 05:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, has an OAM, many media appearances... what more do you want? Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.