Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Chong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 05:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin_Chong[edit]

Vanity page and userfy Dredscott 02:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Looks like he's prominent enough to me. A Google search for "Neil Young Nation", for example, shows that it's even appeared in the NYT Book Review. The article is pretty stubby but it should be kept. Devotchka 02:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He's notable enough as a published author. --Cheapestcostavoider 03:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable as published author. Current sales rank on Amazon and BarnesandNoble.com sufficient for current book to meet WP:BIO for authors. —ERcheck @ 03:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep any author in the NYT Book Review.--Pharos 04:31, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's been edited by too many to call it vanity, and he seems to have been published enough to pass WP:BIO. Kevin 11:02, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:BIO criteria. --Ter e nc e Ong 11:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Extremely notable. Computerjoe 's talk 14:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. ILove Plankton ⁽ ^L⁾ 23:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.