Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerry Kincaid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kerry Kincaid[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a politician notable only as a city councillor in a non-metropolitan city. This is not a claim of notability that passes WP:NPOL — the lowest level of office that entitles a person to an article is the state legislature — and the referencing here is extremely reliant on primary and user-generated sources, so WP:GNG isn't passed either. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 10:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 23:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 23:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 23:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 23:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete OK, I guess there's nothing especially notable about this article. Local politician, sources, and issues. Most of the links are dead. The ones that aren't are from the local TV station about minor local issues. I don't think it's all that urgent to delete articles like this, but in principle having non-verifiable information is not a good thing. – Margin1522 (talk) 20:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Puffy, fluffy biography of an essentially run of the mill local politician. Fails the high bar we set for such, which is by consensus more or less the following: election to a mayoralty of a significant city or election to the city council of a metropolis. Carrite (talk) 18:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.