Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent Youth Choirs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article does not demonstrate the notability of its subject, which was not independently determined here, and is in addition a copyright infringement. Any new article on the subject will need to be written in original text (unless sources are released into public domain or licensed compatibly) and verify the notability of the subject with independent, reliable sources. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kent Youth Choirs[edit]

Lack of notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crookesmoor (talk • contribs) 22:06, 2 November 2008

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article has been tagged by copyright violation and is being evaluated. Looking at the source provided, it is blatant copy-paste and would most likely to be fairly handed under copyright problems. In light of this, is it possible to stop this AfD while the article is evaluated in terms of copyright? ^LeaveSleaves _talk 01:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If the article can be deleted on the ground of lack on notability, a time-consuming copyvio investigation would be pointless. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, StarM 22:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No third-party sources, and a Google search returns nothing of substance. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.