Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kennedi Clements

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy. Moving article to User:Captain Assassin!/Kennedi Clements. Deor (talk) 07:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kennedi Clements[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENT (does not have two substantial roles in notable productions), fails WP:GNG (lacks substantial coverage in independent reliable sources). SummerPhD (talk) 14:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Move as actress has played several notable roles in the films and television But if it still fails, then move it to draft until the release of "Poltergeist", in which she is playing one of the lead roles. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 14:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are the "several notable roles"? - SummerPhD (talk) 15:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 19:15, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy - WP:ENT, WP:UFY - Single substantial role in a noteworthy movie and as such fails WP:ENT. However a second movie is very probable at this point. Since the text is not objectionable it can be moved to the user namespace, also since it is requested above by the author. It can be improved and moved back to the article namespace in due time. - Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 15:07, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.