Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keni Stevens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keni Stevens[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Under sourced musician article. Artist may possibly be notable, however, as it stands, he does not pass WP:MUSICBIO. Although the article states his album Blue Moods sold a million copies, I can not find it on any charts nor any reviews. I can barely find any coverage of him at all - he definitely fails WP:SIGCOV. Mbdfar (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Do not delete. The subject of the article appears notable but under sourced. The first in line citation gives significant coverage and is a reliable source. Since it is not WP:BLP it should be kept for other editors to help add sources. Ugbedeg (talk) 10:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ugbedeg, could you be more specific about the source you're referencing? The first in line citation is about a different person, where Keni Stevens is mentioned in passing once. The only other biographical source looks like a blog. I want to agree with you, but I can't find any sources to substantiate any of the claims of the article. This actually is WP:BLP, and he does not pass WP:GNG nor any other notability checks. Mbdfar (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per the nominator. Mbdfar's assessment of the article in The Guardian is correct - it is not about the subject, and contrary to Ugbedeg's assertion, does not provide any significant coverage about him. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.