Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken J. Nolan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ken J. Nolan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is positively refbombed, and yet the only source that comes even close to significant coverage has no byline and looks like a press releases [1]. Does not meet WP:GNG _signed,Rosguill ^talk 07:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 07:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 07:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 07:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 07:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Talk about WP:REFBOMBing; more like carpet bombing. None of the sources - including the one singled out by nom - contains more than a passing mention, and many no more than a namecheck. I searched for his lawfirm, Nolan Auerbach & White, and I can't see how even that would pass WP:GNG. Zero WP:RS coverage, fails GNG and WP:NBIO. Narky Blert (talk) 07:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely WP:REFBOMBed but a quick evaluation of sources makes it very apparent that Nolan does not pass WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.